<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Image Generator on Grainy Mære</title>
		<link>/tags/image-generator/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Image Generator on Grainy Mære</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 15:37:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="/tags/image-generator/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>AI, Art and editing pics</title>
				<link>/ai_art_and_editing_pics/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 15:37:00 +0200</pubDate>
				<guid>/ai_art_and_editing_pics/</guid>
				<description>&lt;figure&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;/img/ferris_wheel.webp&#34;&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;/dith/ferris_wheel_dithered.png&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p class=&#34;intro&#34; data-letter=&#34;T&#34;&gt;The last few days, I’ve had a lot of discussions about AI image generators and art. With tools like DALL-E, Midjourney, or Stable Diffusion, you can create images from just a short description and some parameters - though I think “AI” is a misleading term here. These algorithms aren’t intelligent or sentient; they’re more like remix generators, fed with existing knowledge (the training data). Since the beginning of the month, I’ve had a Midjourney subscription to test one of the generators. I’ve used it often to get a feel for the process and its potential. The surreal images and the open, social nature of Midjourney are really interesting and feel unique, but after a while, I’m not sure what to think about these image generators if I want to have a sophisticated opinion. One thing is for sure: they are a gamechanger.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
